The sheer breadth of Indian business in the
U.K. leaves Prime Minister Theresa May with a challenging task on her India
visit: to address anxieties about the direction of Brexit negotiations
For over a year now, ever since it
began eyeing international expansion, Bengaluru-based education start-up
BRAINSTARS India has been considering the U.K. The company, which develops
maths, science and English products for six- to 14-year-olds, had thought
Britain attractive for a number of reasons: a well-established and predictable
school education system, and a strong university tradition of research and
development.
The
June 23 referendum result — in which Britain voted to leave the European Union — has done little to dent the
enthusiasm of co-founder and CEO Ravi Shankar, who is headed to London on a
reconnaissance trip next week. Even setting aside the weakening of the pound,
which has made Britain a decidedly cheaper place to invest for Indian
companies, it has thrown up opportunities, with the company attracting interest
from other regions of the U.K. such as Wales, and the European continent, he
says. “If you take a small business like us that does very niche work, we are
now looking at a more competitive situation.” His belief that school policy is
unlikely to change fundamentally in the wake of Brexit, as it might in other
areas, also gives him a level of predictability perhaps not so widely
experienced.
India Inc.’s
expanding footprint
Since the morning of June 24, the question of what the impact of Brexit will be on Indian businesses in the U.K. — or those looking to invest — remains a major and perhaps unanswerable one. There are over 800 companies from India that have operations in the U.K., with a large number of others with deep connections to the country. In the last few decades, the Indian business landscape in the U.K. has changed significantly: while the likes of Tata Steel and Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) remain stalwarts and big employers, others have been growing rapidly. Bharti Airtel, HCL Technologies, Emcure Pharmaceuticals and Apollo Tyres were among the businesses identified as growing at a particularly high rate by consultancy Grant Thornton earlier this year.
Since the morning of June 24, the question of what the impact of Brexit will be on Indian businesses in the U.K. — or those looking to invest — remains a major and perhaps unanswerable one. There are over 800 companies from India that have operations in the U.K., with a large number of others with deep connections to the country. In the last few decades, the Indian business landscape in the U.K. has changed significantly: while the likes of Tata Steel and Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) remain stalwarts and big employers, others have been growing rapidly. Bharti Airtel, HCL Technologies, Emcure Pharmaceuticals and Apollo Tyres were among the businesses identified as growing at a particularly high rate by consultancy Grant Thornton earlier this year.
“Indian companies are in a huge
variety of sectors from pharmaceuticals to the creative industries,
manufacturing and financial services. So when one talks about the impact of
Brexit, they are facing a very similar situation across the board to U.K.
businesses,” says Manoj Ladwa, the founder of Indiaincorporated.com and
political strategist. “There is certainly some degree of anxiety about whether
there will be a hard Brexit or a soft Brexit with some open market access.”
According to Acting High
Commissioner Dinesh Patnaik, companies are already in the process of gaining
the necessary licences and other factors needed to operate in Europe, should
the need for separate ones arise. “For companies, Brexit has already happened.”
The serious plight of some sectors
has already been taken into account to some degree: last weekend the government
sought to allay fears about the car industry, which is not only dependent on a
cross-European supply chain but also exports much of its product to the
continent. Business Secretary Greg Clark said he had pledged to push for a
tariff-free relationship for the sector, as well as provide as much support for
the industry as it was able to without breaching tough EU aid rules. However,
whether it will be enough to convince JLR, which has a number of decisions over
the location for production of upcoming models in the next several years still
to be made, remains to be seen.
Questions
across sectors
There are even bigger questions for the rest of Britain’s manufacturing industry and sectors such as steel: industry body UK Steel has pointed out that not only is the steel sector heavily dependent on the EU (around half of its steel exports annually go to the continent), but it is also dependent on coordinated action with the EU when it comes to anti-dumping tariffs on produce from China and beyond. For a long time, Britain voted against or abstained when it came to the anti-dumping levy, so its enthusiasm for doing so in a Brexit Britain remains questionable.
There are even bigger questions for the rest of Britain’s manufacturing industry and sectors such as steel: industry body UK Steel has pointed out that not only is the steel sector heavily dependent on the EU (around half of its steel exports annually go to the continent), but it is also dependent on coordinated action with the EU when it comes to anti-dumping tariffs on produce from China and beyond. For a long time, Britain voted against or abstained when it came to the anti-dumping levy, so its enthusiasm for doing so in a Brexit Britain remains questionable.
Similar uncertainty hovers over the
pharmaceutical sector, says Anuj Chande of Grant Thornton, pointing to the
London-headquartered European Medical Agency. “The question is of course where
the headquarters would be under a hard Brexit, and that could potentially hit
pharmaceutical companies and their access to European registration for their
drugs. The devil will be in the detail.”
He draws a distinction between firms
attracted by the U.K. with specific conditions — for its design and technology,
for example — against those for whom it has been a launch pad. For the former,
it has been businesses as usual or in some cases a more attractive market, with
the near 20 per cent weakening of the pound. He points to the recent Mahindra
& Mahindra purchase of motorcycle maker BSA Company, and believes there
will be more to come. “We have a number of businesses selling in the food
manufacturing and distribution industry and we are seeing Indian interest
primarily because it’s a cheap acquisition,” he says.
One of the industries most
significantly impacted is likely to be the IT sector — and on a number of
levels. In a policy paper ahead of the referendum, Indian IT industry body
Nasscom spelt out the sector’s concerns which included the decline of the
pound, which would render existing contracts “losing propositions” unless
renegotiated. It also pointed to the uncertainty over the free movement of
people across the EU, given the fact that the IT sector relies on being able to
move skilled workers across the EU from London headquarters.
While the large players have largely
remained silent, for some in the sector the change in the exchange rate has
already begun to impact decisions. Anil Mudumbi, an Indian-origin entrepreneur
who founded Amalytics, which develops software for financial institutions in
the U.K. and has developers in both India and the U.K., says initial plans to
hire developers in India in its next round of expansion were being reconsidered
with the currency movement making Britain a more affordable option. “Companies
are certainly reviewing their offshoring strategy, and to what extent it makes
sense any more,” he says.
A
challenging task
The sheer breadth of Indian business in the U.K. will leave British Prime Minister Theresa May with a challenging task when she embarks on her visit to India at the weekend. The visit is being seen as a chance for her to showcase and provide reassurances for industry not just from India but across the world, concerned about the direction of Brexit negotiations.
The sheer breadth of Indian business in the U.K. will leave British Prime Minister Theresa May with a challenging task when she embarks on her visit to India at the weekend. The visit is being seen as a chance for her to showcase and provide reassurances for industry not just from India but across the world, concerned about the direction of Brexit negotiations.
“Most businesses recognise the fact
that the government cannot fully disclose its negotiating hand but at the same
time there needs to be more meat on the bone,” says Mr. Ladwa, who is critical
of the sector-by-sector approach to reassurances currently embarked upon. “May
has to be as clear, open and frank as possible to give the Indian and
international business community a clear vision.”
--------------------THE HINDU------------------------

Comments
Post a Comment