ESSAY SYNOPSIS & FRAMEWORK

Justice is not in Law, Justice is all about how we treat each other

  1. Meaning of Justice—Just/Right/Truth.
  2. Classification of Justice.
Legal Justice
Non Legal Justice
  1. Justice is culture specific, value specific and region specific.
  2. Meaning of Justice by law
To streamline desirable conduct.
To evolve a uniformity.
To treat everyone as same.
To ensure governance and administration.
Justice by law is legal, logical, Argumentative and can be manipulative
  1. Limitations of Justice by law.
·         Externally imposed laws can never be substitute for internal values.
·         Governance has a formal accountable structure so flaw in governance.
·         Accountability flows from law, responsibility does not flow from law.
·         Justice without emotions has many limitations.
·         Legal justice just not foresee circumstances intentions.
·         Legislated laws may not ensure justice and rules can be broken.
·         To be more legally correct, the country requires number of laws and greater the number of laws more corrupt the country is
·         legal justice can be manipulated/subjected to various interpretations.
·         Despite strong laws justice has not been delivered.
  1. Does justice reside in law?
(a)  It is Yes, and
(b)  It is No as well
  1. Justice is
.respect for each other
                  …..conduct.
               …..character.
                     …….truth.
   ……….transparency.
             …….language.
           …….expression.
..behavior and actions.
……..matter of feeling, feeling of
                   …..equality
             …togetherness
                    ….respect.
  1. No law can define, determine and set the following…
(a)  Whether the elected representatives act as representatives or act as masters or as servants of society.
(b)  Whether the prime minister sees himself as a ruler or servants of the public.
(c)   Whether the doctor treats the people suffering as patient or as clients.
(d)  Whether the teachers treat students as students of reform or as customers.
(e)  Whether the students consider themselves as learners or as consumers.
(f)    Whether the son respects the father or treats him as a support till unemployment.
(g)  Whether the boy lusts for a girl and wants to use her or loves her.
(h)  Whether a pharmaceutical company treats people in a manner to evolve a research or as guinea pigs.
(i)    Whether the policies of the government are for welfare of the people or to win popularity and elections.
(j)    Whether a husband does sex with his wife or makes love to her.
In any case, if these things are flouted, camouflaged, hidden then the treatment has not been as per justice.
  1. Conclusion
Human beings are only part logical they are more emotional, more sensitive, more illogical
Our treatment for each other necessities justice, move towards justice, ensures justice.
No one knows better than oneself whether the treatment that has been meted out confirm, to the standards of honesty, transparency, truthfulness, humanity.
If these yardsticks are met there is no way that one can be biased, one sided, feelingless, non transparent, unequal and disrespectful, and that will determine our treatment.
When the treatment has been so justice has been done.

Justice is indeed not in law, it’s in the way we treat each other.

Comments